Page 489 - Ebook HTKH 2024
P. 489

effect of technology on the environment (De Jesus Pacheco DA et al., 2016; Nguyen
                  Anh  Tuan,  2021).  Furthermore,  Dinh  Hong  Linh  and  Nguyen  Thi  Hang  (2021)

                  concluded that technology is the most important factor affecting green growth, followed
                  by  institutions,  human  resources,  infrastructure,  corporate  perception,  and  capital.
                  Therefore, the fourth hypothesis is:
                        H4: Technological capability positively affects its green growth outcomes.
                        Human Resources
                        Company resources include not only capital or technology but also critical human
                  resources.  Effective  management  of  capital  and  technology  requires  high-quality
                  human  resources.  Employee  involvement  in  training  and  environmental  quality

                  improvement  facilitates  achieving  green  growth.  Empirical  research  by  De  Jesus
                  Pacheco DA et al. (2016), Nguyen Anh Tuan (2021), Dinh Hong Linh & Nguyen Thi
                  Hang (2021) also indicates a positive impact of human resources on green growth. Thus,
                  the fifth hypothesis is:
                        H5: Human resources positively affect its green growth outcomes.
                                            Figure 1. Proposed research hypotheses
































                        3. Data and research methods
                        3.1. Research data
                        The data in the article includes both primary and secondary data. Primary data was
                  collected through surveys of business owners at production and business establishments
                  in traditional craft villages in Van Lam district, Hung Yen. The author conducted 180
                  surveys, but only 174 valid responses were used for analysis. All survey questions were
                  qualitative variables with a Likert scale from 1 to 5. (Where: 1 – Strongly Disagree; 2 –

                  Disagree; 3 – Neutral; 4 – Agree; 5 – Strongly Agree).
                        3.2. Research methodology
                        The author employs both qualitative and quantitative analysis in this study.




                                                                                                         481
   484   485   486   487   488   489   490   491   492   493   494