Page 457 - Ebook HTKH 2024

Q3. Enabling enterprises to achieve their 3.52 0.77 A
sustainability goals.

Q4. Leading enterprises to improve 3.69 0.80 A
enterprises’ reputation and brand value.
Q5. Helping enterprises attract talents with 3.76 0.87 A
strong commitments to sustainability.
Average weighted mean 3.63 0.82 A

The following Table 3 presents the respondents’ opinions on the impacts of GT&D
on SGEG in Vietnam’s SMEs with the average weighted mean of 3.64 and standard
deviation of 0.79. The effect enhancing employee satisfaction and retention within
enterprises focused on sustainability was ranked the highest with a weighted mean of
3.78 while the impact developing a skilled workforce for green industries and leading to
measurable improvements in environmental performance and sustainability outcomes

were ranked second with the same weighted means of 3.64. The respondents viewed
enabling employees to engage better in sustainable practices and leading to increased
innovation in sustainable technologies as the third and the fourth with the weighted
mean of 3.59 and 3.56 respectively.
Table 3. Respondents’ views on impacts of GT&D on SGEG in Vietnam’s SMEs
Descriptive Statistics
Impacts of GT&D on SGEG in Vietnam’s
SMEs Weighted Standard Descriptive
mean deviation rating
Q6. Leading to increased innovation in 3.56 0.67 A
sustainable technologies.
Q7. Enabling employees to engage better in 3.59 0. 78 A

sustainable practices.
Q8. Developing a skilled workforce for 3.64 0.82 A
green industries.
Q9. Enhancing employee satisfaction and 3.78 0.86 A
retention focused on sustainability.

Q10. Leading to improvements in 3.64 0.82 A
environmental performance and
sustainability outcomes
Overall weighted mean 3.64 0.79

The results of the survey about the respondents’ opinions on impacts of GPM on
SGEG in Vietnam’s SMEs have shown in the Table 4 below.

449