Page 538 - ISC PROCEEDINGS 21.4
P. 538

explored the psychological mechanisms behind BNPL’s effect on consumer behavior,
                  particularly the role of mental accounting and payment pain.
                        Moreover, the moderating role of financial literacy in the BNPL-spending
                  relationship remains underexamined, especially in emerging markets like Vietnam, where
                  financial literacy is low, increasing overspending risks (Pamungkas & Putri, 2024).
                  Satisfaction, often seen as an outcome, has not been studied as a mediator through which
                  BNPL influences shopping intentions.
                        This study aims to fill these gaps by exploring BNPL's impact on online shopping
                  behavior, focusing on mental accounting, payment pain, and satisfaction as mediators. It
                  also examines financial literacy as a moderator, assessing how consumers' financial
                  knowledge affects BNPL's influence on shopping intentions. Based on the findings, the
                  study offers managerial insights for e-commerce and fintech firms on optimizing BNPL,
                  along with recommendations for consumers on using BNPL sustainably.
                        2. Theoretical framework
                        2.1. Theoretical foundations
                        2.1.1. The Stimulus - Organism - Response (SOR) model
                        The Stimulus–Organism–Response (S-O-R) model, developed by Mehrabian and
                  Russell (1974) based on Watson’s (1913) Stimulus–Response theory, explains how
                  external environmental stimuli (S) affect individuals’ internal psychological states (O),
                  which subsequently shape their behavioral responses (R). In this study, the stimulus (S) is
                  the use of Buy Now, Pay Later (BNPL). The organism stage (O) focuses on consumers’
                  psychological processes when using BNPL, particularly mental accounting and the pain of
                  paying. The resulting response (R) is reflected in the online shopping behavioral intention
                  of Generation Y and Generation Z consumers in Vietnam.
                        2.1.2. Mental accounting theory
                        Mental accounting is a core concept in behavioral economics, with its early
                  foundations reflected in Kahneman and Tversky’s Prospect Theory (1981). Thaler
                  (1985;1999) later established mental accounting as a foundational theory for explaining
                  human behavior, describing how individuals cognitively categorize and manage money by
                  assigning it to separate “mental accounts” (e.g., savings, daily expenses, leisure) rather
                  than treating money as fully fungible. Thaler identified three core components of mental
                  accounting: Perception and Evaluation, Budgeting, and Choice Bracketing. Through these
                  mechanisms, mental accounting shapes how individuals make decisions related to
                  spending, saving, investing, and borrowing (Thaler, 1985; 1999).
                        2.1.3. Hyperbolic discounting
                        Hyperbolic discounting, first discussed in Richard J. Herrnstein’s work and later
                  formalized by George Ainslie (1975), refers to a behavioral bias where individuals favor
                  smaller, immediate rewards rather than larger rewards available in the future. This theory
                  posits that discount rates are time-inconsistent and decline over time, implying that
                  human decision-making changes over time and follows a hyperbolic curve (Ainslie, 1975).
                  In the context of BNPL, installment payments shift consumers’ attention from the total
                  price to smaller periodic payments, reducing perceived payment pain and increasing
                  willingness to purchase. From this perspective, deferred payments amplify present bias,
                  causing consumers to overvalue immediate benefits while undervaluing future costs
                  (Cheng & Huo, 2025).






                  537
   533   534   535   536   537   538   539   540   541   542   543