Page 540 - ISC PROCEEDINGS 21.4
P. 540

H4: Pain of paying has a negative impact on consumers' online shopping
                  behavioral intention.
                        Due to its convenience and flexibility, BNPL as an electronic payment method may
                  enhance the payment experience and thereby increase customer satisfaction in online
                  shopping. (Hossain & Zhou, 2018; Roozbahani et al., 2015). In the context of examining
                  the impact of Buy Now, Pay Later (BNPL) on online purchase behavioral intention based
                  on Oliver (1997)‘s original definition, satisfaction can be understood as user’ overall
                  assessment and emotional reaction to their experience of using BNPL throughout the
                  shopping process (Hegawan et al., 2023). Prior empirical evidence has consistently
                  confirmed the pivotal role of satisfaction in shaping consumer behavior (Zeithaml et al.,
                  1996; Yen & Gwinner, 2003; Yao et al., 2018; Hegawan et al., 2023).
                        H5: The use of Buy Now, Pay Later (BNPL) services has a positive impact on
                  consumers' satisfaction.
                        H6: Consumers' satisfaction has a positive impact on consumers' online shopping
                  behavioral intention.
                        According to the OECD (2016), financial literacy extends beyond theoretical
                  knowledge to include the ability to apply such knowledge in selecting, using, and
                  managing financial products effectively. Individuals with higher levels of financial literacy
                  tend to demonstrate stronger expense management, more careful consideration of risks
                  and consequences, and are therefore less prone to impulsive or excessive spending
                  (Atkinson & Messy, 2012; Hayhoe et al., 2000; Perry & Morris, 2005). Prior studies have
                  suggested that higher financial literacy helps consumers better control impulsive
                  purchasing tendencies (Aulia et al., 2023) and overspending (Andayani, 2024) in digital
                  environments. Beyond its direct effects, empirical evidence further underscores that
                  financial literacy acts as a moderator in the relationship between BNPL usage and online
                  shopping behavioral intention (Ahn and Nam, 2022; Ramadani and Artadita, 2022; Shah
                  et al., 2024)
                        H7: Financial literacy has a negative impact on consumers' online shopping
                  behavioral intentions.
                        H8: Financial literacy moderates the relationship between the use of Buy Now, Pay
                  Later (BNPL) services and consumers' online shopping behavioral intentions.
                        3. Research methodology
                        The research method used for this study is a quantitative method. The quantitative
                  method, the authors chose the simple random sampling method to collect the primary
                  data by distributing questionnaires. The questionnaire was completed in a self-
                  administered form, which could be completed by the respondents without the aid of the
                  researcher team’s control (Gravetter & Forzano, 2016).
                        The questionnaire of this study was created using Google Forms and was distributed
                  to a group of Generation Y and Z who are living in Hanoi and are the users of the BNPL
                  payment method. Each response to the questions in this survey is evaluated by using a
                  five-point Likert scale, and the data analysis of this study is conducted via the Structural
                  Equation Modeling (SEM) by using the SmartPLS software.
                        4. Findings and discussion
                        4.1. Demographic
                        The authors first received 374 respondents, and after cleaning the data, 325
                  respondents were qualified. The demographic details of the qualified respondents are
                  illustrated in the table below:


                  539
   535   536   537   538   539   540   541   542   543   544   545