Page 681 - ISC PROCEEDINGS 21.4
P. 681

supportive tool that enhances learning. For instance, AI can be used to suggest guiding
                  questions rather than provide immediate conclusions, encouraging learners to engage in
                  inquiry and reflection. It should also offer partial feedback instead of completing
                  assignments, ensuring that students remain responsible for their own work.
                        Moreover, AI can present counterarguments to prompt self-assessment, helping
                  learners evaluate their reasoning from multiple perspectives. It may also assist in error
                  checking only after learners have independently completed a task, reinforcing the
                  importance of initial cognitive effort. Additionally, learners should be required to
                  compare their work with source materials, fostering analytical skills and accuracy. Finally,
                  AI should encourage self-interpretation and retrieval in learners’ own words, which
                  strengthens understanding and long-term memory retention. In this way, AI becomes a
                  tool for deep learning rather than a shortcut that undermines it.

                        References
                        [1]. Baddeley, A. (2000). The episodic buffer. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(11),
                  417–423.
                        [2]. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative
                  Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
                        [3]. Brookhart, S. M. (2010). How to assess higher-order thinking skills in your
                  classroom. ASCD.
                        [4]. Carr, N. (2010). The shallows. W. W. Norton.
                        [5]. Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind.
                        [6]. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Mixed methods research. Sage.
                        [7]. Firth, J., et al. (2019). The online brain. World Psychiatry, 18(2), 119–129.
                        [8]. Immordino-Yang, M. (2012). Neuroscience of reflection.
                        [9]. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar.
                        [10]. Kirschner, P. A., & De Bruyckere, P. (2017). Digital native myth. Teaching and
                  Teacher Education, 67, 135–142.
                        [11]. Luckin, R., et al. (2016). AI in education.
                        [12]. Ophir, E., Nass, C., & Wagner, A. D. (2009). Media multitaskers. Proceedings of
                  the National Academy of Sciences, 106(37), 15583–15587.
                        [13]. Rosen, L. D., et al. (2013). Multitasking and attention. Computers in Human
                  Behavior, 29(3), 948–958.
                        [14]. Schultz, W. (2016). Dopamine reward prediction.
                        [15]. Selwyn, N. (2019). AI and education. Polity Press.
                        [16]. Squire, L. R., & Dede, A. (2015). Memory systems. Cold Spring Harbor
                  Perspectives in Biology.
                        [17]. Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory. Springer.



















                                                                                                      680
   676   677   678   679   680   681   682   683   684   685   686