Page 196 - ISC PROCEEDINGS 21.4
P. 196

FROM E-GOVERNMENT TO AI-ENABLED GOVERNANCE: EVIDENCE FROM
                       INTERNATIONAL INDICES AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS FOR VIETNAM


                                            1
                         Nguyen Minh Nga* , Hoang Hong Phuc , Vu Thuy Linh , Dong Thi Phuong      4
                                                                2
                                                                               3
                                          1, 3, 4  Hanoi Open University, Hanoi, Vietnam.
                                            2  Thang Long University, Hanoi, Vietnam.
                                                (*E-mail: nmnga@hou.edu.vn)

                                                         ABSTRACT
                        The rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming digital
                  governance and accelerating the transition from traditional e-government toward AI-
                  enabled public administration. This study examines Vietnam’s position in this transition
                  by integrating three global indicators: the United Nations E-Government Development
                  Index (EGDI), the World Bank GovTech Maturity Index (GTMI), and the Government AI
                  Readiness Index. Drawing on the Technology–Organization–Environment (TOE)
                  framework combined with Institutional Theory, the study conceptualizes digital
                  government development as a three-layer structure consisting of e-government
                  foundations, GovTech integration, and AI readiness. Using comparative descriptive
                  analysis based on recent international datasets, the study evaluates Vietnam’s
                  performance relative to selected ASEAN countries. The results show that Vietnam has
                  achieved notable progress in digital infrastructure and GovTech implementation, but
                  remains comparatively weaker in AI readiness. By integrating multiple international
                  measurement systems within a unified analytical framework, the study identifies a
                  structural gap between digital government development and AI capability, thereby
                  providing new empirical evidence on the challenges facing Vietnam’s transition toward
                  AI-enabled governance.
                        Keywords: AI-enabled governance; digital government; govtech; AI readiness;
                  Vietnam.

                        1. Introduction
                        Digital transformation is reshaping how governments organize administrative
                  processes and deliver public services. Over the past two decades, many countries have
                  adopted e-government systems to digitize administrative procedures and expand online
                  public services. More recently, the focus has shifted toward broader forms of digital
                  governance that rely on integrated digital platforms, data sharing, and advanced analytics
                  to improve policy design and public sector performance (Mergel et al., 2019; OECD, 2025).
                  Within this transformation, artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly viewed as a key
                  enabling technology, allowing governments to automate administrative processes,
                  support policy analysis, and provide more responsive public services (Wirtz et al., 2019).
                        As digital technologies evolve, the evaluation of digital government capacity has
                  also expanded. Early studies typically assessed e-government development based on the
                  availability of online services and ICT infrastructure. More recent research emphasizes the
                  need to examine broader layers of digital capability, including e-government
                  infrastructure, GovTech systems, and national readiness for AI adoption (Janssen et al.,
                  2020; Zuiderwijk et al., 2021). In response, several international organizations have
                  developed global indicators that measure different aspects of digital governance, most


                  195
   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201