Page 432 - ISC PROCEEDINGS 21.4
P. 432

professionals need to ensure transparency regarding AI’s benefits and mechanisms;
                  meanwhile, citizens should view AI as a supportive tool and base their decisions on
                  practical value, personal experience, and professional medical advice.


                        Reference
                        [1]. Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1998). A conceptual and operational definition of
                  personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology. Information Systems
                  Research, 9(2), 204–215.
                        [2]. Bansal, H. S. (2005). “Migrating” to new service providers: toward a unifying
                  framework of consumers’ switching behaviors. Journal of the Academy of Marketing
                  Science, 33(1), 96-115.
                        [3]. Brown, S. A., & Venkatesh, V. (2005). Model of Adoption of Technology in
                  Households: A Baseline Model Test and Extension Incorporating Household Life Cycle1.
                  MIS Quarterly, 29(3), 399–426.
                        [4]. Chen, Y. H., & Keng, C. J. (2019). Utilizing the Push–Pull–Mooring model to
                  investigate switching intentions in healthcare services. Journal of Medical Systems, 43(6),
                  1–12.
                        [5]. Chen, Y.-H. (2024). Exploring Indonesian Consumers’ Continued Switching
                  Intention to Telemedicine Platforms Post-Covid-19: An Application of the Push-Pull-
                  Mooring (Ppm) Model.
                        [6]. Cheng, M., Li, X., & Xu, J. (2022). Promoting Healthcare Workers’ Adoption
                  Intention of Artificial-Intelligence-Assisted Diagnosis and Treatment: The Chain Mediation
                  of Social Influence and Human–Computer Trust. International Journal of Environmental
                  Research and Public Health, 19(20), 13311.
                        [7]. Cheng, S., Lee, S.-J., & Choi, B. (2019). An empirical investigation of users’
                  voluntary switching intention for mobile personal cloud storage services based on the
                  push-pull-mooring framework. Computers in Human Behavior, 92, 198–215.
                        [8]. Chi, M., Wang, J., Luo, X. (Robert), & Li, H. (2021). Why travelers switch to the
                  sharing accommodation platforms? A push-pull-mooring framework. International Journal
                  of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 33(12), 4286–4310.
                        [9]. Choi, B., & Yoon, C. (2025). An empirical study on the intention to switch to
                  cloud-based hospital information systems in Korea: A push–pull–mooring model
                  perspective. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 16(3), 432–453.
                        [10]. Choudhury, A., Asan, O., & Medow, J. E. (2022). Effect of risk, expectancy, and
                  trust on clinicians’ intent to use an artificial intelligence system - Blood Utilization
                  Calculator. Applied Ergonomics, 101, 103708.
                        [11]. Dai, Q., Li, M., Shi, S., Yang, M., Wang, Z., Liao, J., … Tao, L. (2025). Structural
                  equation modeling for influencing factors on behavioral intention to adopt medical AI
                  among Chinese nurses: A nationwide cross-sectional study. BMC Nursing, 24(1), 1084.
                        [12]. Dao, H. M., Nguyen, L. H., Linh Dan, D. D., & Mai, N. T. T. (2025). Determinants
                  of consumer intention to adopt medical AI in an emerging economy: The role of self-
                  concept and initial trust. Telematics and Informatics Reports, 18, 100213.
                        [13]. Deloitte. (2025, January 29). 2025 global health care outlook.
                        [14]. Duy Hung, P., Thong, V. H., Van Tuan, P., Dang Khoa, N. H., & Trang, N. Q.
                  (2024). Switching intention to online channel in Vietnam – A case study of consumer
                  electronics goods. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1).




                  431
   427   428   429   430   431   432   433   434   435   436   437