Page 179 - ISC PROCEEDINGS 21.4
P. 179

threshold inequality-amplifying mechanism dominates, while high-income economies
                  must already address platform concentration.
                             Table 4. Income-group-specific turning points (interaction model)
                      Income Group           Turning Point Std. Err. z       p-value 95% CI
                      High income            51.9%          12.6       4.11 < 0.001 [27.1%, 76.6%]
                      Upper middle income 66.4%             25.4       2.62 0.009      [16.7%, 116.2%]
                      Lower middle income 66.5%             37.1       1.79 0.073      [−6.7%, 139.6%]
                      Low income             15.9%          12.5       1.26 0.206      [−8.6%, 40.4%]
                      Full sample            61.6%          24.1       2.55 0.011      [14.0%, 109.2%]
                                                                 Note: Estimated via nlcom (delta method).
                                                 Reference group: High income. Low income uses cluster SE.
                        4.3. Robustness: Alternative ICT measures
                        Table 5 reports three robustness specifications. Model (5) uses the lagged internet
                                                      ̂
                  term: coefficients are insignificant (β₁ = −0.017, p = 0.442), consistent with distributional
                  effects operating through long-run cumulative channels rather than year-to-year
                  adjustments (Piketty, 2014). Model (6) replaces internet with fixed broadband: β₁ =
                                                                                                       ̂
                  −0.061 (p = 0.043) and β₂ = 0.0024 (p < 0.001), with a turning point of 12.9 subscriptions
                                          ̂
                  per 100 (p = 0.009). This substantially lower threshold reflects fixed broadband's high-cost
                  adoption structure (Gruber & Koutroumpis, 2011): since early adopters are
                  overwhelmingly high-income households, the distributional ceiling is reached at very low
                  aggregate penetration. Model (7) uses mobile cellular subscriptions: no significant
                                          ̂
                  nonlinearity is found (β₁ = −0.022, p = 0.150; β₂ = −0.00002, p = 0.772), attributable to
                                                                 ̂
                  mobile's broad cross-income diffusion through prepaid and low-cost plans (Bahia et al.,
                  2020). The contrast between Models (6) and (7) identifies cost barriers to initial adoption
                  as the primary mechanism driving technology-specific distributional dynamics.
                        Table 5. Robustness — Alternative ICT measures (dependent variable: gini)
                       Variable           (5) Lagged Internet (6) Broadband        (7) Mobile
                       ICT (linear)       −0.017 (0.022)       −0.061** (0.028)    −0.022 (0.015)
                       ICT (squared)      0.0001 (0.0003)      0.0024*** (0.001) −0.00002 (0.0001)
                       edu                0.037*** (0.010)     0.028*** (0.010)    0.030*** (0.010)
                       trade              0.017*** (0.005)     0.008* (0.004)      0.013* (0.006)
                       inflation          −0.039 (0.023)       −0.018 (0.023)      −0.022 (0.022)
                       Country / Year FE Yes / Trend           Yes / Yes           Yes / Yes
                       SE type            DK (l=3)             DK (l=3)            DK (l=3)
                       Observations       1,054                1,275               1,346
                       Within R²          0.122                0.148               0.164
                       Turning point      104.1% (p=0.635)     12.9 (p=0.009)      not nonlinear
                             Note: ***p < 0.01, **p < 0.05, *p < 0.10. DK = Driscoll–Kraay. Turning points via
                                                                                                   nlcom.
                        4.4. System GMM
                        Table 6 presents two-step System GMM results (36 instruments; Hansen J: χ²(6) =
                  6.45, p = 0.374; AR(2): z = 0.83, p = 0.409). The lagged Gini enters with ρ̂ = 0.971 (p <
                  0.001), confirming extreme persistence. The internet coefficients are statistically
                  indistinguishable from zero — a result that reflects the near-unit-root persistence of
                  income distribution absorbing identifying variation, consistent with Roodman (2009),
                  rather than contradicting the nonlinear fixed effects findings.



                                                                                                      178
   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184