Page 653 - ISC PROCEEDINGS 21.4
P. 653

perspective.      European       Journal       of      Education,      60,      e12923.
                  https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12923
                        [18]. Miranda, F. J., & Chamorro-Mera, A. (2025). Exploring the adoption of
                  generative artificial intelligence tools among university teachers. Higher Education
                  Research & Development. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2025.2559648
                        [19]. Møgelvang, A., & Pedersen, L. (2025). Generative AI in action: Acceptance and
                  use among higher education students. Education and Information Technologies.
                  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-12540-3
                        [20]. Saif, N., Ahmed, S., & Khan, M. (2024). ChatGPT adoption among university
                  students:     A     TAM-based      study.     Computers      in    Human       Behavior.
                  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107478
                        [21]. Sakkal, A., & Martin, L. (2019). Learning to rock: The role of prior experience
                  and explicit instruction on learning and transfer in a music videogame. Computers &
                  Education, 128, 389–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.10.007
                        [22]. Salmerón, L., Sampietro, A., & Delgado, P. (2020). Using internet videos to
                  learn about controversies: Evaluation and integration of multiple and multimodal
                  documents by primary school students. Computers & Education, 148, 103796.
                  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103796
                        [23]. Sergeeva, O. V., & Ivanov, P. (2025). Understanding higher education students’
                  adoption of generative AI technologies. Contemporary Educational Technology.
                  https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/16039
                        [24]. Sousa, A. E., & Gomes, R. (2025). The technology acceptance model and
                  adopter type analysis in artificial intelligence adoption. Electronics, 14(7), 1258.
                  https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14071258
                        [25]. Strzelecki, A. (2023). ChatGPT in higher education: Benefits and risks of
                  generative     artificial   intelligence.    Interactive    Learning      Environments.
                  https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2192500
                        [26]. Stuart, J., & Scott, R. (2021). The measure of online disinhibition (MOD):
                  Assessing perceptions of reductions in restraint in the online environment. Computers in
                  Human Behavior, 114, 106534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106534
                        [27]. Tbaishat, D., & Al-Okaily, M. (2026). Modeling generative AI adoption in higher
                  education using integrated frameworks. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence.
                  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2026.100221
                        [28]. Tlili, A., et al. (2023). What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case
                  study of using chatbots in education. Smart Learning Environments, 10, 15.
                  https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00237-x
                        [29]. Tran, N. M., & Nguyen, H. (2025). Factors influencing students’ willingness to
                  use    generative     AI    technologies.    Journal    of    Technology      Education.
                  https://doi.org/10.18178/jte.2025.12.3.1738
                        [30]. Ursavaş, Ö. F., & Yildirim, S. (2025). Investigating the acceptance and use of
                  generative AI among university students. International Journal of Educational Technology
                  in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-025-00535-z
                        [31]. Wang, J., & Li, Y. (2025). Students’ continuance intention to use generative AI
                  in    higher     education.    ACM      Conference     on     Learning     Technologies.
                  https://doi.org/10.1145/3765325.3765346






                                                                                                      652
   648   649   650   651   652   653   654   655   656   657   658