Page 352 - ISC PROCEEDINGS 21.4

interfaces (APIs), seller identification protocols, and standardized data fields are
operationalized consistently across domestic and foreign platforms.
The second lever is order–payment–logistics data interoperability. CBEC governance
only becomes genuinely risk-based when authorities can reconcile three basic data
streams: who ordered the goods, how payment was made, and how the goods moved.
China’s customs architecture is stronger precisely because it has worked for years with
structured customs codes and data-linked clearance procedures (GACC, 2014, 2019, 2020).
Vietnam’s challenge is not the absence of rules, but the lack of a common transaction-
data language that can be used across platforms, customs, tax authorities, and logistics
operators without excessive manual intervention.
The third lever is near-border warehousing and smart-border logistics. Here the
corridor dimension becomes tangible. Direct parcel-throughput statistics for the
Vietnam–China CBEC corridor are not consistently published in a unified series, so proxy
indicators are necessary. On the Lang Son side, the smart border-gate pilot signaled
movement toward digital coordination between customs clearance and dedicated border
logistics processes (Lang Son Department of Foreign Affairs, 2024). In December 2024, a
new Viettel logistics park in Lang Son was reported to have capacity for up to 1,500
vehicles per day, roughly doubling the then-current customs-clearance capacity at Dong
Dang (People’s Army Newspaper, 2024). In Lao Cai, authorities first pushed for a cross-
border e-commerce zone and regional ASEAN–China logistics center, then in March 2026
received approval for a smart border-gate project at Kim Thanh and Ban Vuoc that aims
to double freight throughput and reduce logistics costs by 20–30% by 2030 (Lao Cai
People’s Committee, 2026; VietnamNet, 2024).
The fourth lever is single-window exchange and enforcement analytics. Corridor
governance becomes effective when data can move horizontally across customs, tax,
consumer protection, and platform supervision. In practical terms, that means pre-arrival
declaration, digital traceability, risk scoring, and selective inspection rather than blanket
manual control. Once these elements are connected, policy changes can produce causal
effects: better data visibility improves tax administration; better data quality reduces
customs delay; better logistics performance improves platform reliability; and higher
reliability raises the competitiveness of compliant sellers.
3.4. Implications for individual sellers and SMEs
For Vietnamese sellers, the immediate effect of tighter CBEC regulation is usually
higher compliance cost. Identification requirements, e-invoicing, withholding mechanisms,
and stricter consumer-protection obligations all increase the burden of formalization. Yet
the longer-term effect may be positive if those changes create clearer records, more
predictable dispute handling, and better access to financing based on verifiable cash flow.
A second implication is the gradual erosion of pure tax arbitrage. Once low-value
imported goods are less able to rely on tax exemptions and once foreign platforms are
pressed to localize compliance, the relative advantage of under-taxed low-price imports
narrows. This does not remove China’s scale advantage, but it does make room for
competition based on quality assurance, authenticity, lead-time reliability, and after-sales
performance rather than on informal price distortion alone.
A third implication concerns strategic dependence on platforms. Cases involving the
registration pressure placed on Temu and Shein show that platform access can change
quickly when policy tightens (Reuters, 2024a, 2024b). SMEs therefore need multi-homing
strategies across multiple marketplaces and stronger first-party data capture through

351