Page 111 - Ebook HTKH 2024
P. 111

The research uses data sets collected from financial statements and annual reports
                  for 2014 - 2023. However, some banks could have publicly provided complete data

                  during collection. So, the authors only collected data through 20 commercial banks in
                  Vietnam to conduct research. At the same time, variables belonging to the group of
                  macro factors such as GDP economic growth, inflation rate, and CO2 emissions were
                  measured  through  secondary  data  sets  collected  from  independent  official  entities,
                  reputable in the period 2014 - 2023, for example, World Bank Climate Watch.
                        In  order  to  estimate  the  model,  we  found  the  system-GMM  dynamic  panel
                  estimator is a method compiled of first-differences instrumented on lagged levels and
                  on the ground that it provides a scrupulous cure for endogeneity bias (Blundell & Bond,

                  1998).  In  addition,  it  also  holds  two  measurement  errors;  the  GMM  dynamic  panel
                  estimator is more robust. Second, if we adequately lagged the instrumental variables,
                  this  estimator  remains  steady.  Therefore,  we  employ  the  two-step  estimator  as
                  (Semykina & Wooldridge, 2010) stated that it solves the problems of heteroscedasticity,
                  the autocorrelation of errors, simultaneity bias, and measurement mistakes. To test the
                  validity  of  the  instruments,  we  use  the  Hansen  test  of  overidentifying  restrictions

                  (Hansen, 1982) with a null hypothesis that there is no correlation  between  instrumental
                  variables  and  residual.  We  also  use  the  Arellano-Bond  (AR)  test  with  a  null
                  hypothesis that there is no second-order autocorrelation.
                        4.  Research results and discussions
                        The  results  in  Table  2  display  our  efforts  to  find  empirical  evidence  on  the
                  relationship between CO2 emissions and NPL. Although the results do not demonstrate
                  the  influence  of  NPL  and  group-3  and  4  loans,  significant  results  are  found  in  the

                  remaining variables: Gross NPL, group 2, and group 5 loans.
                      Table 2. Estimated results of CO2 emissions have a positive impact on NPL
                   Variables  Gross         NPLs          Group-2      Group-3    Group-4       Group-5
                                NPLs                      loans        loans      loans         loans
                     l.NPL      1,391***  0,672***        0,612***    0,270***     0,042        0,416***
                      CO2      -0,019***    0,002        -0,011***    0,002         0,000        -0,003**
                      LGR     -0,013         -0,005       -0,006       0,004*       -0,001      -0,017***

                      GDP     0,050         0,079***     0,028         0,010**     0,031***      0,024**
                      INF      -0,141***  -0,138***     -0,070*     0,006          -0,025         -0,005
                    Constant    0,036***  0,005***     0,020**     -0,005           0.002        0,008**
                      AR2        0,278       0,838        0,235        0,187        0,071          0,220
                    Hansen     0,372         0,088        0,478        0,212        0,127          0,484

                      Obs.       200         200          200          200          200            200
                        ***, **, and * indicate statistical significance at the 1%, 5% and 10% levels
                        respectively.
                                                    Source: Authors’ estimates using STATA 17.0 Software
                       The  results show how CO2 emissions impact gross NPLs, group-2, and group-5
                   loans.  Specifically,  the  regression  coefficients  of  these  three  variables  are  -0.019,




                                                                                                                                                                      103
   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116