Page 700 - ISC PROCEEDINGS 21.4

[13]. Bellini-Leite S. C. (2022). Dual Process Theory: Embodied and Predictive;
Symbolic and Classical. Frontiers in psychology, 13, 805386.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.805386
[14]. de Jong, S., Paananen, V., Tag, B., & van Berkel, N. (2025). Cognitive forcing for
better decision-making: reducing overreliance on AI systems through partial explanations.
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 9(2), 1-30.
[15]. Vejandla, S., Ray, A., Sikstrom, L., Ratto, M., Zaheer, J., & Maslej, M. M. (2025).
Impacts of cognitive forcing and need for cognition on biased AI-assisted decision making
about mental health emergencies. Scientific Reports.
[16]. Parveen, A., Ganie, A. N., Bashir, F., & Zimik, P. (2025). Factors influencing self-
confidence among adolescents and children across the globe: a systematic review.
Discover Education.
[17]. Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning.
Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4
[18]. Reich, T., Schneider, C. R., & Dugas, M. (2025). Does artificial intelligence cause
artificial confidence? Generative artificial intelligence as an emerging social referent.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000450
[19]. Fleming, S. M., & Dolan, R. J. (2012). The neural basis of metacognitive ability.
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 367(1594), 1338–
1349. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2011.0417

Appendix
1. Reading MCQ piece used in assessment
In less than a century, Hollywood has grown from a toffee-nosed village to a town as
famous as New York, Rome or Paris. And physically, of course, it has changed beyond
recognition: a century ago, you would walk through orange groves to the village store. Yet
in a way, it is still a village – parochial, with limited horizons – just a little bit of Los
Angeles. For all who live and work in it, there is one topic of conversation – films: how
much they have made, who is dating whom, who's been stabbed in the back, who is
'attached' to which project. Those who have been successful often try to get away: to
work there, but live somewhere else. Yet it is still the one place in the world to which
almost everyone who is anyone in show-business (and plenty who aren't) eventually
gravitates.
Who does 'and plenty who aren't' refer to?
A people less well-known in the world of entertainment
B people not resident in Hollywood
C people unlikely to achieve celebrity status
D people not welcome in Hollywood
2. LLM responses in different conditions
2.1. Assertive response (AR)
Why C is correct: "Everyone who is anyone in show-business" refers to people who
have achieved celebrity/star status. "And plenty who aren't" is the contrast — people
who come to Hollywood but are unlikely to ever reach that celebrity status. They still
gravitate there, drawn by the dream, even though success is improbable for them.
Why A is wrong: The phrase is specifically about show-business, not about general
fame or being "well-known in entertainment." A implies some degree of recognition in

699