Page 674 - ISC PROCEEDINGS 21.4
P. 674

Research indicates that excessive reliance on AI can lead to cognitive dependency
                  and technostress, ultimately weakening learners’ ability to engage in self-directed
                  learning. This phenomenon reflects a broader concern that AI, when improperly used,
                  may replace rather than support human cognition.
                        Cognitive offloading and the decline of deep thinking
                        A central mechanism underlying this issue is cognitive offloading—the transfer of
                  mental effort to external tools. While moderate offloading can be beneficial (e.g., using AI
                  to summarize information), excessive reliance reduces the brain’s engagement in higher-
                  order cognitive processes. Empirical studies have demonstrated a negative relationship
                  between AI dependence and critical thinking ability, with cognitive offloading serving as a
                  mediating factor.
                        When learners consistently outsource tasks such as evaluation and reasoning, they
                  engage less in processes that require working memory activation and executive control.
                  Over time, this diminished engagement may lead to a decline in analytical capacity and
                  independent judgment.
                        The erosion of productive struggle
                        Productive struggle—defined as meaningful cognitive effort during learning—is
                  essential for deep understanding. It involves grappling with complex material, making
                  errors, and constructing knowledge through active engagement. Neuroscientific evidence
                  suggests that such effort activates key brain regions, including the prefrontal cortex and
                  hippocampus, facilitating deep encoding and long-term memory consolidation.
                        However, when AI provides immediate answers, learners may bypass this critical
                  process. This creates an illusion of mastery, where learners perceive understanding
                  without having developed robust cognitive structures. Although AI can improve
                  academic performance in structured learning environments with appropriate
                  scaffolding, unregulated use may diminish the benefits of productive struggle and
                  hinder higher-order thinking.
                        2.3.2. Impacts on attention and cognitive engagement
                        Deep thinking requires sustained attention and tolerance for cognitive difficulty.
                  The convenience of AI—particularly instant response systems—may condition learners to
                  expect rapid solutions. This shift can reduce their ability to maintain attention on complex,
                  long-duration tasks such as reading academic texts or constructing arguments.
                        Behavioral studies suggest that learners frequently use AI for quick information
                  retrieval and content generation, reinforcing patterns of immediate gratification. Over
                  time, this may weaken attentional control and reduce persistence in cognitively
                  demanding activities.
                        Implications for memory formation
                        Long-term memory formation depends on deep processing, meaningful association,
                  and repeated retrieval. When AI performs substantial portions of the learning task,
                  learners may only superficially encounter information rather than actively encode it. This
                  reduces hippocampal activation and weakens the consolidation of knowledge into long-
                  term storage.
                        Importantly, AI does not directly impair memory from a biological standpoint.
                  Instead, it alters the conditions necessary for effective learning by reducing effort,
                  retrieval practice, and critical evaluation. Consequently, knowledge structures formed
                  under such conditions are often shallow and unstable.




                  673
   669   670   671   672   673   674   675   676   677   678   679